Chasles attended the Lycée Impérial for his secondary education. Then, in 1812, he entered the École Polytechnique in Paris. This was the period when Napoleon was desperately trying to call up conscripts for his armies as he attempted to replenish the troops lost in the fighting. In January 1813, after the disaster of the Russian campaign, Napoleon called up more men to fill the dwindling numbers in his armies. Chasles was called up to take part in the defence of Paris in early 1814. Shortly after Paris fell, Napoleon abdicated on 6 April 1814 and the war was over. Chasles was able to return to his studies at the École Polytechnique.
Having obtained a place in the engineering corps, Chasles decided not to accept it but to give his place to one of his fellow students who was in financial difficulties. At this point Chasles returned to living at home but his father insisted that he join a firm of stockbrokers in Paris. This was not the occupation for Chasles but he obeyed his father's wishes and went to join the firm in Paris to learn the trade of a stockbroker. However, Chasles was interested in history and in mathematics and he was not successful as a trainee in the firm. He returned again to his home where he could pursue his historical and mathematical interests.
In 1837 Chasles published his first major work Aperçu historique sur l'origine et le développement des méthodes en géométrie Ⓣ which quickly made his reputation as both a mathematician and as an historian of mathematics. Aperçu historique Ⓣ is still an important historical reference. It was written because of a question asked in 1829 by the Royal Academy in Brussels. The question asked for :-
... a philosophical examination of the different methods in modern geometry, in particular the method of reciprocal polars.In Aperçu historique Ⓣ Chasles studied the method of reciprocal polars as an application of the principle of duality in projective geometry; in the same way the principle of homography leads to a great number of properties of quadric surfaces. The Académie des Sciences wanted to publish the work which Chasles submitted to them but he asked to be able to add to the historical introduction as well as to add further historical notes to the text and include some new material and notes. This work in many ways is the crucial one for Chasles's future research since almost all of the many works he produced throughout the rest of his career elaborate on points discussed in these notes he added to the Aperçu historique Ⓣ. The extended version is the one which the Academy published in 1830. Koppelman notes in  that the work had one weakness. This was that Chasles could not read German so he was not so familiar with the recent results published in that language.
On the strength of his fine work Chasles became professor at the École Polytechnique in Paris in 1841, at the age of nearly 48. Topics he taught were geodesy, mechanics, and astronomy. In 1846 he was appointed to a chair of higher geometry at the Sorbonne which had been specially created for him. He continued to teach at the École Polytechnique after this appointment at the Sorbonne but he resigned his post at the École Polytechnique in 1851, retaining his chair at the Sorbonne until his death.
He also wrote an extremely important text on geometry showing the power of synthetic geometry. In his text Traité de géométrie Ⓣ in 1852 Chasles discusses cross ratio, pencils and involutions, all notions which he introduced. In fact Möbius independently introduced the cross ratio. A second text, Traité des sections coniques Ⓣ (1865), applied these techniques to conic sections. The principle of duality occurs throughout his work which was carried further by Steiner.
One of the results for which Chasles is well known is his enumeration of conics. Questions of this type go back to Apollonius, but such questions had arisen while Chasles was working on geometry, in particular the Steiner "problem of five conics" was posed in 1848. This problem, namely to determine the number of conics tangent to five given conics, was solved incorrectly by Steiner who gave the answer 7776. Chasles solved this problem correctly in 1864 when he gave the answer of 3264. Chasles' developed a theory of characteristics to solve this problem and Chasles's characteristic formula is discussed in .
Koppelman writes in :-
Chasles published highly original work until his very last years. He never married, and his few interests outside his research, teaching, and the Academy, which he served on many commissions, seem to have been in charitable organisations.Chasles received many honours for this highly original work. He was elected a corresponding member of the Académie des Sciences in 1839 and a full member in 1851. He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of London in 1854 and won its Copley Medal in 1865. The London Mathematical Society was founded in 1865 and it elected Chasles in 1867 as its first foreign member. He was also a member of academies in Brussels, Copenhagen, Naples, Stockholm, St Petersburg, and the United States.
There is one aspect of Chasles's life which seems so out of character with the brilliant man that he was that it caused him great distress. He was the victim of a celebrated fraud paying the equivalent of 20,000 pounds for various letters from famous men of science and others which turned out to be forged. Chasles collected autographs and manuscripts but appears to have displayed a naiveté which is almost unbelievable. Chasles bought thousands of manuscripts from Denis Vrain-Lucas between 1861 and 1869. Vrain-Lucas sold Chasles documents which purported to be part of correspondence between Newton, Pascal, and Boyle. Chasles presented the letters to the Académie des Sciences in 1867 for they "proved" that Pascal was the first to propose the universal law of gravitation, and not Newton.
As one might expect this created a great controversy. Chasles argued strongly that the letters were genuine. However Vrain-Lucas was tried in 1869-70 for forging the documents and Chasles had to appear at the trial. It was an extremely uncomfortable experience for Chasles since he had to admit in court that he had purchased documents supposedly written by Galileo, Cleopatra and Lazarus and how someone of Chasles's intelligence and a deep interest in history would have believed that these all these wrote in French is beyond belief! Vrain-Lucas was found guilty and Chasles, although 77 by this time, must have looked extremely silly.
Article by: J J O'Connor and E F Robertson